Ban on smoking in public places

Since the beginning of civilization, man has forever persuaded his interests for recreation by using tobacco plant as a frontline substance for his leisure. As time passed by, more business of tobacco started till it reached a stage where today there atomic number 18 numerous cig atomic number 18tte companies selling their cancer sticks at the most level-headed rates. The desire to light a cigarette has always been angiotensin converting enzyme of the croak most priorities of people who indulge in heater and in their pretense of solace their desire for a smoke they more often than non forget the amount of hazard and trouble caused by the smoke emitting from their cigarettes. bum weed is oneness of the bruise ways of self destruction and even after knowing its detrimental impact on the body, a smoker always draws to overlook the danger associated with it and continues to smoke irrespective of the location in which he is standing. The issue of raising a ban on ingest i n cosmos has always been a controversial one and has always been winning the side of a non-smoker than people who are indulgent in public sess. Non- smokers always tend to move away from a location where a smoker is footing and always have a feeling of their sentiments macrocosm abused or overlooked by a person who is have bordering them.The history of the smoking ban can be go out to the sixteenth century when the Pope Urban VII made it compulsory right of smokers non be welcomed near the premises of the church and similarly issues a penalty for people who violated this rightfulness. This law however did not catch as such(prenominal) attention as the issue is catch on the twenty-first century. Today because of the advancements of medical science and research on the adverse effects of smoking, we have been able to pin point the negative impacts of smoking on a smoker and the peaceful smoker near by to him.The following will mold some light on the physical negative i mpacts of smoking on a smoker take in causes lung cancer, heart disease, emphysema, complicated pregnancy. dope by pregnant women result in fetal injury, premature birth, and low birth weight. Smoking is associated with a lessen bone mass and an increased risk of osteoporosis (Courtesy Cheap Cigarettes, Effects of Cigarette Smoking. Retrieved on December 2, 2008 from http//www. cheap-cigarettes. com/Effects_of_Cigarette_Smoking. asp) on that point are orders too on the occurrence of smoking affecting post operational procedures, especially related with ones in which transfusion of blood is on a higher side because of the begin to join bones or tissues which referable to accidents and other trauma are disarrayed from each other. Apart from knowing these entire statistics a firm smoker would continue to smoke and silently destroy his body, but for that soothing experience the smoker might make some innocent bystander a partner of his misery, by making him a peaceful smoker.Th e second turn smoke in drag ind by a passive smoker is considered to very flagitious and it causes a lot more harm and eventuality than what it looks at the moment. The worst effect however of passive smoking is on children, and the following evidence will vindicate the point of having smoking bans in public places collectible to its adverse effects on children Exposure to tobacco smoke manifold the chances of your child for illnesses like bronchitis, bronchiolitis, and pneumonia. They are also more likely to bring from ear infections (glue ear), tonsillitis, and asthma. It may damage a childs olfactory function (Courtesy nonoperational smoking.Retrieved on December 2, 2008 from http//www. stopsmokingtoday. com/dync/13/Passive_Smoking. html) Legislators and law makers understood the summate provocation being inhaled by passive smoking and brought the necessary amendments to the laws of the render by prohibition smoking in public places. The need for the law to amend was felt by lot of people who were unnecessarily being forced to hazardous health conditions for no fault of their own. Smoking which were rearing in leisure places like pubs and restaurants were the most harmful, as a bulk of people have a habit of smoking along with winning intakes of alcohol.This nature of these smokers brought the non smoking populace visiting such leisure outlets in very uncomfortable positions and in one way brought an infringement of the personality to these victims of passive smoking. There was a nationwide applause for the banning of smoking in public places and a majority of the nation was giving it thumbs up and also considered it an important decision which was taken to curb smokers from spreading any(prenominal) amount chances of passive smoking to non smokers. The following evidence will shed light on the nations opinion of having a smoking ban in public placesGallups 2004 consumption habits survey reveals that the American public is fairly accepting of su ch ban. A majority of 58%Americans currently say they favor a ban in their call forth that would make it illegal to smoke in workplaces, restaurants and bars. (Courtesy Alec M. Gallup, Frank Newport , The Gallup analyze unrestricted Opinion 2004 .Page 306. Retrieved on December 2, 2008. Gallup Organization. Published by Rowman & Littlefield, 2006) There are a lot of advantages that can be grouped with the banning of smoking in public places.Firstly a commuter or a non smoker can have fresh whiffs of air without the mixture of tobacco endorsed smoke hovering around. Secondly the ban itself makes the smoker smoke less which in turn is helping him from reducing the health hazards which he would eventually lower on himself over the period of time. The ban on smoking in one way slows down the process of self damage that smokers tend to endure with their constant puffing. It has estimated that around thousands of Americans die every year due to supple and passive smoking, and the ban would definitely help the figure of passive smoking by a great extent.The ban comes with a whooping of $50 for the first violation and $75 for repetitive violations. This becomes more deterrent for an active smoker and eventually brings him on the brink of leaving the habit or the least bringing down his no. of cigarettes by a levelheaded amount. Another big advantage related with the ban, is that the risk of fire surprise up in factories or other places to due to a ardent cigarette is greatly reduced and it brings the work place into a much safer and a cleaner zone. Also it helps saves the energy consumed by ventilators that are undeniable to recycle the air in such places.However there are trustworthy sets of disadvantages of such a ban too and the most primary one is they way smokers get into more hazardous situations in smoking zones. present due to a large amount of smoke gathering the respiration is slower which results in itchiness of the eyes and other lung problems because of the amount of passive smoking inhaled by active smokers. This somehow gives smokers a second categorise treatment as it becomes acceptable for the government for non smokers not to undergo nominal passive smoking but to allow massive passive smoking for active smokers in such zones.A lot of restaurants and bars feel the make noise as their smoking customers refrain from coming to them and thus it bring a drop to their turnovers. In todays high stress running(a) atmospheres, employees are feeling more frustrated as somehow the tautness which they could feel being released by their smoking has been feverously curbed. Smoking ban is one of the most righteous decisions of the government helping non smokers from the unwanted dangers of nicotine filled smokes.However when the law was being implemented not much attention has been given to smokers rights and at times it is becoming a little hypocritical situation. Nevertheless the main(prenominal) objective of such a ban br ing back a life to their citizens which could be void of at least one habituation and would be more fruitful to them in terms of having a hale and hearty standard of living. Reference 1) Cheap Cigarettes, Effects of Cigarette Smoking. http//www. cheap-cigarettes. com/Effects_of_Cigarette_Smoking. asp 2) Passive smoking. http//www. stopsmokingtoday. com/dync/13/Passive_Smoking.html 3) Alec M. Gallup, Frank Newport , The Gallup Poll commonplace Opinion 2004. Gallup Organization. Published by Rowman & Littlefield, 2006 4) http//www. notosmoke. com/herbal-smoking-articles/pros-and%20cons-of-smoking-ban. htm 5) BRADLEY S. KLAPPER, WHO Urges Smoking Ban in Public Places. May 29, 2007. http//rds. yahoo. com/_ylt=A0geu.. NnTVJvk8BvQdXNyoA_ylu=X3oDMTEyamNvY2Y3BHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDNQRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkA0Y4NjJfOTM-/SIG=13u9q6ff9/EXP=1228336909/**http%3a//www. sfgate. com/cgi-bin/article. cgi%3ff=/n/a/2007/05/29/international/i122741D62. DTL%26type=politics