'Being and Becoming: Becoming by Being Essay\r'

'Pre-Socratic era was marked by fulfilments from Thales of Miletus until that period when Socrates philosophy was yet to be born. It was during this period when the fundamentals of science ( some(prenominal) natural and social were organism founded using scientific research and inquiry, and where philosophy and realistic science were still married. Sophos tried to understand and condone the origin, genius, elements, ontogenesis and workings of the universe by representation of argumentative reasoning, critical inquiry and justifications.\r\nPre-Socratic philosophy was mainly characterized by its elements much(prenominal) as essence, change/absolute, unity and its effort to understand the essential substance of a thing that caused its existence and the dynamic movement it undergoes (changes) to be known as what it is today. Among the famous thinkers of this period were Thales, Heraclitus, Anaxagoras, Empedocles, Democritus and Parmenides.\r\nWhereas pre-Socratic philosophe rs wear had formulated a common line of theory, variation was inevitable. Among the arguments that showed differences of the philosophy of that period was Parmenides’ opening of Being and Heraclitus’ theory of Becoming. Heraclitus argued that the existence of everything was brought closely by nothing and that it ceaselessly exists through constant change or by undergoing a dynamic renderation. What is more striking about the concept of change for Heraclitus is the concept of change within.\r\n jibe to him, it is that contradiction of elements/substance within the object that caused it to transform and that to cause its change, an external intervening need not to be imposed. Accordingly, for Heraclitus, the world is a continuous jumble and strife, hence it needs change. In contrast, spell the knowledgeable aspect of an existing element undergoes alterations, the process by which an element transforms is ever constant.\r\nThrough the instinct of the nature of an element, Heraclitus recognized that the fixed states of being ar completely part of the varied state of perpetual becoming1. In humans, the processes of giving birth, living, dying and rebirth are both changes that a person passes through. However, such pattern is a never-ending cycle, after all. What will â€Å" reach” of a matter is a product of the dynamic development it subjects itself through a never ceasing rhythm.\r\nContrary to Heraclitus’, while Parmenides likewise argued that an object exists because it does exist (that no otherwise factor that may explain the causality of its existence), he failed to recognize if it ever underwent an evolutionary state, thus do it the â€Å"being” as it is today. Because Parmenides believed †and apparently refuted Heraclitus †that the universe was already at the state of stability, why should it be basking on the process of modification? Everything is what it is because it is what it is and i t cannot become what it is not.\r\nBoth arguments are of much interest specifically in understanding how do we â€Å"become” or what make us came to â€Å"being”. Later on during Plato’s time, both arguments could be reconciled by proposing that, what might â€Å"become” is caused by a â€Å"being”.\r\nHowever, unlike the former arguments of Heraclitus’ and Parmenides, it is apparent that the reconciliation of the arguments were based on the thought that, indeed, there is a â€Å"first cause” that is never changing but rather causes the â€Å"second being” to become what it is today. Note that both the initially mentioned thinkers do not believe on something that might kick in caused on object to exist.\r\nWhat could be more sticky in the understanding of this discourse is the process of analyzing concepts that flourished centuries apart(predicate) and merging them into one critical explanation such that conflict resoluti on could be gained.\r\nReferences:\r\n__________. Philosophy Pages. In Britannica Internet Guide Selection. Retrieved April 11, 2008, from http://www.philosophypages.com/dy/p.htm#parm\r\n__________. (April 16, 2002). Pre-Socratic Era. Posted to http://everything2.com/index.pl?node_id=628825\r\nBallantyne, capital of Minnesota F., Ph.D. History and Theory of Psychology: An Early twenty-first Century Student’s Perspective. (2008). Retrieved April 10, 2008, from www.comnet.ca/~pballan/section1(210).htm\r\nGoodman, Len E. (1992). Avicenna:Arabic Thought and Culture (pp 53-54). Routledge. Retrieved April 12, 2008, from http://books.google.com.ph/books?id=VJ6x-pcqMicC& adenylic acid;pg=PA51& antiophthalmic factor;lpg=PA51& international axerophtholere;dq=resolving+the+argument+of+being+and+becoming&source=web&ots=gctA47HxTQ&sig=R0YNJ23QzZlvTpaLA5XclFgdKfY&hl=en#PPR5,M1\r\nRose, Jake. Being and Becoming. In Ezine Articles. Retrieved April 11, 2008, from http://ezine articles.com/?Being-and-Becoming&id=148729\r\n \r\n'